we were talking to Anna Kasprzik
Subject indexing in libraries is still costly. Machine learning methods offer the potential for facilitation at work. We spoke with Dr Anna Kasprzik about the automation of subject indexing. Since the end of 2018, she has been a research assistant at the ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics and is responsible for the management / coordination of the automation of subject indexing with machine learning methods (AutoSE).
She aims to create bridges between research and library operations and to ensure the transfer of research results into practice.
How do you use machine learning for automatic subject indexing in the ZBW?
With machine learning, you always need training data first so that the machine has a pattern from which to learn. Training data in our case are metadata records for resources that were indexed intellectually using the STW Thesaurus for Economics. These are then used to train several machine learning procedures and their results are combined in a rule-based fusion approach: A STW descriptor must be proposed by at least two procedures, otherwise it will not be included; and for a resource, at least two STW descriptors must be proposed from the STW subthesauri for Business Administration or Economics.
Graphic → Kasprzik, Anna: Conference Paper — Published Version Putting Research-based Machine Learning Solutions for Subject Indexing into Practice
What experience have you gained so far?
Taking the first steps with machine learning methods is easy – but getting these machine learning methods to a level that meets the requirements of our working context is a very complex task. A basic requirement is the existence of suitable training data – this applies not only to the quantity (the more, the better), but especially to its diversity: ideally, for all cases (that is, for all STW descriptors) that I want to distinguish, there should be enough metadata records in which these descriptors occur to provide the machine with enough examples from which it can learn how to achieve the desired result.
What is the status of the automation of subject indexing?
Over the course of the last few years, a machine learning-based prototypical solution has been developed in an internal ZBW research-based project. Since 2016, four copies of the EconBiz metadata base for the ZBW collection have been processed and the results have been fed back into the database. However, this solution has not yet been integrated into the other productive workflows of the library; the process had to be initiated manually.
What is the biggest challenge in automating subject indexing?
The automation of subject indexing is a balancing act between quality standards, as defined by the intellectual subject indexing to date, and technological change, which may result in new requirements and new potential in the field of retrieval.
The core aim of indexing of course still is to present users with the most relevant resources in response to a content-based search query, and this only makes sense if as many resources as possible are indexed, otherwise they cannot be compared – here, of course, the automation of subject indexing can help to index collections that are no longer intellectually manageable in terms of numbers. In addition, a subject indexing with our controlled vocabulary, the STW, only creates an added value compared to modern text mining algorithms if we provide the resource with structured semantic information that can be evaluated in retrieval.
The availability of external additional information, for example from the Linked Open Data Cloud, in combination with semantic technologies, opens up completely new possibilities. However, these first have to be tested for their suitability for everyday use and, step by step, cast into solutions that can be implemented in today’s library operations.
How does automated subject indexing turn from a project into a permanent task?
First of all, by officially declaring it a permanent task, prioritizing it accordingly – and providing it with the appropriate resources. We have already taken this step at the ZBW and have hired an additional software developer who will help us over the next few years to build an architecture that allows the integration of machine learning solutions into the subject indexing operation at the ZBW. This is to ensure that results from applied research are actually applied in practice.
- Presentation slides: “Putting Research-based Machine Learning Solutions forSubject Indexing into Practice” by Dr Anna Kasprzik.
- Conference Paper: Kasprzik, Anna: Conference Paper — Published Version: Putting Research-based Machine Learning Solutions for Subject Indexing into Practice (PDF).
- Proceedings of the Conference on Digital Curation Technologies (Qurator 2020), 20.01. – 21.01.2020 in Berlin.
- Informations about the ZBW project Automatization of Subject Indexing using methods from artificial intelligence.
Dr Anna Kasprzik (Twitter: AnkasZBW) studied Computational Linguistics, Computer Science and Cognitive Psychology in Tübingen, followed by a PhD in Theoretical Computer Science in Trier (completed in 2012) and a library traineeship (Q4) at the Bavarian Library Academy in Munich with a practical year at KIM Konstanz (completed in 2014). Starting in 2014, she was initially a research assistant in an IT project for the Bavarian Library Network in Munich and from 2016 onwards, she was a research assistant / junior research group leader in the Research and Development Department at the TIB Hannover (activities in the area of controlled vocabularies, Semantic Web and Industry 4.0). Since November 2018 she has been a research assistant at the ZBW and is responsible for the management / coordination of the automation of subject indexing with machine learning methods (AutoSE).
Open Science Maturity: Universities in Finland in the leading position
Finland has already achieved considerable milestones in fostering an open science...